R. KIPLING’S COMPOUND LEXEMES FOR VERBALIZATION OF HUMAN’S SOCIAL PROBLEMS

УДК 811.111’373:81’38

                                                 

Candidate of Science (Philology) Dembovska L. M. , Interregional Academy of Personnel Management

Methodist teacher of the English language KozinaYa.M. 

Specialist school № 159, Kyiv, Ukraine

R. KIPLINGS COMPOUND LEXEMES

FOR VERBALIZATION OF HUMANS SOCIAL PROBLEMS

 

К. філол. н., Дембовська Л. М.

Міжрегіональна академія управління персоналом;  

Вчитель-методист англійської мови Козіна Я. М. 

Спеціалізована школа № 159, Київ, Україна

КОМПОЗИТНІ ЛЕКСЕМИ Д. Р. КІПЛІНГА

ДЛЯ ВЕРБАЛІЗАЦІЇ СОЦІАЛЬНИХ ПРОБЛЕМ ЛЮДСЬКОГО СУСПІЛЬСТВА

 

К. филол. н., Дембовская Л.М.

 Межрегиональная академия управления персоналом; Учитель-методист английского языка Козина Я.Н. 

Специализированная школа № 159, Киев, Украина

КОМПОЗИТНЫЕ ЛЕКСЕМЫ Д. Р. КИПЛИНГА

ДЛЯ ВЕРБАЛИЗАЦИИ СОЦИАЛЬНЫХ ПРОБЛЕМ ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКОГО ОБЩЕСТВА

 

 

The article deals with the compounds in Kipling’s fictionImportance of functional approach to surveying of speech phenomena on the basis of consistency of language is stressed. This approach considers cognitive processes and psychological mechanisms of communicative interaction as well as extralinguistic surrounding in which the realization of language units takes place. Connotative meanings of compound lexemes both inherent and contextual are considered. Axiological characteristics of these lexemes and their efficiency for verbalization of social problems have been analyzed. The stylistic functions of compounds as means of expression the author’s intentions in the fiction discourse are under consideration.

Key words: compound, consistency of language, meliorative and pejorative connotation, social problems, epithet configuration, metaphor, pragmastylistic functions.

 

Стаття присвячена дослідженню створення та функціонування структурно складних слів у лінгвокультурному просторі творів Р. Кіплінга. Наголошується важливість функціонального підходу до вивчення мовленнєвих явищ на основі системності мови з урахуванням когнітивних процесів та психологічних механізмів комунікативної взаємодії, а також позамовного середовища, в якому відбувається реалізація одиниць мови. Розглядаються конотативні значення структурно складних одиниць, як власні, так і набуті під впливом контексту. Аналізуються також аксіологічні характеристики композитів  та їх значимість для вербалізації соціальних проблем суспільства. Розглядаються прагмастилістичні функції композитів як засобів вираження інтенцій автора в художньому дискурсі.

Ключові слова: композит, системність мови, меліоративні та пейоративні конотації, соціальні проблеми, епітетна конфігурація, метафора, прагмастилістичні функції.

 

Статья посвящена образованию и функционированию структурно-сложных слов в лингвокультурном пространстве произведений Р. Киплинга. Подчеркивается важность функционального подхода к исследованию речевых явлений на основе системности языка с учетом когнитивных процессов и психологических механизмов коммуникативного взаимодействия, а также внеязыковой среды, в которой происходит реализация единиц языка. Рассматриваются коннотативные значения структурно-сложных единиц, как собственные, так и возникающие под влиянием контекста. Анализируются также аксиологические характеристики композит и их значимость для вербализации автором социальных проблем общества. Рассматриваются прагмастилистические функции композит как средств выражения интенций автора в художественном дискурсе.

Ключевые слова: композита, системность языка, мелиоративные и пейоративные коннотации, социальные проблемы, эпитетная конфигурация, метафора, прагмастилистические функции.

 

 

The relevance of the research question. Cognitive activity supposes determination of the nature of the object of perception, revelation and studying of the character of relationships between the objects of reality and also between the components of the given object. Various objects of material world exist not separately but in interconnection and interaction. These peculiarities of material world were registered at the ancient times and were put into the basis of the principles of consistency [1, p. 15]. Systemic approach to language study appeared in linguistics at the beginning of the XX century. The development of a language involves all its levels into a process of changing, so the research of language phenomena should be done according to their systemic status, interrelations and structure. As language is a universal way of people’s communication, the whole structure of the language is adopted to this process. Consistency is one of the fundamental features of a language.

Cognitive processes, psychological mechanisms, strategies and effectiveness of communicative interaction are under consideration in the functional approach to linguistic researches. Thus preverbal thinking, memory, knowledge, social and personal experience influence the analysis of communication. Researchers transferred attention onto a human as a subject of communication and society. Language is considered according to human needs, social factors and extra-linguistic environment.

While analysing language functions and separate language units, A. Levitsky states that functioning of language units depends directly on purposes of communication providing its adequacy [2, p. 20]. Extra-linguistic environment is also very important [2, p. 53].

Compound words correspond to two main principles of discourse organization. They are to make discourse the most informative and clear and to reach this goal with minimal efforts. These principles are determinative in choosing one unit among all possible in a particular text and a real discourse.

The relevance of the research caused by general tendency of present linguistic works about discourse aspects of language units functioning and about detection the role of compounds in verbalization of social problems by fiction authors.

The purpose of the research is to clarify the peculiarities of compounds functioning in fiction discourse.

The achievement of assigned goal provides solution of a number of tasks:

  • to clarify functional and pragmatic aspects of compounds by researching of connotative meanings both inherent and which appear due to the context;
  • to determine the regularities of a compound and context interaction;
  • to determine the regularities of expressing axiological categories in non-coin words;
  • to define perspectives of usualization of non-coin words as a way of enriching the English Vocabulary.

The object of the research is English compounds of direct and indirect nomination.

The subject of the analyses is structural-semantic, functional-stylistic and pragmatic peculiarities of compounds in fiction discourse.

Compound lexemes extracted from the works of D. R. Kipling by the method of total selection served as a material for the research.

Statement of the base material.  While creating a fiction text the author addresses hypothetical reader trying not only to give the information about the content of the text, but also to affect recipient’s  emotions, his/her world outlook, to interact with reader’s world picture for the purpose of appropriate understanding and interpreting the work of fiction. So far as a fiction text unlike scientific or business one can’t be emotionally neutral [3; 4], thus decisive importance for a researcher of a fictional discourse is stylistic marking of text structures. The usage of compounds plays an important role for solving these tasks because a compound unit often joins a referent’s name and its description in one word.

Structural-semantic analysis of compounds in D. R. Kipling’s works has shown a significant prevalence of substantive words over others. They are nouns built on the model (n+n), among which agentive nominative units with the suffix -er are most numerous. But there are also other structural models in the analyzed group, though not so many.

Compounds in R. Kipling’s works have very specific meanings according to peculiarity of his characters. Kipling’s characters are animals endowed with human qualities. Moreover, animal and human qualities are interlaced very closely and sometimes it is even difficult to distinguish whose qualities they are – human’s or animal’s ones. This interlace is expressed by compound nouns with the second component ― People: SnakePeople, JunglePeople, MonkeyPeople; sometimes -Folk is used as the second component with the same meaning: MonkeyFolk, ElephantFolk.

Kipling’s characters can think and speak like people, however, their statements are full of bright features of animals in such a way as people imagine them.

Especially valuable qualities among Jungle-People are the ability to hunt in an honest way, pursuing and gaining a victory over a prey. That’s why agentive nominative units with the second component -killer, —eater (maneaters, cattlekiller, frogeater, fishkiller etc.) have pejorative connotations which underline low, even no value of a weak, unable prey and despise of such a “hunter” because no “selfrespecting animal” degrades to such “hunting”.

The animals in Kipling’s jungle world are evidently divided into positive and negative characters. The positive ones are free hunters: wolves, Baloo the bear, Bagheera the panther, Kaa the snake; the negative ones are jackals and monkeys. The component -log in the names of these negative characters stresses the pejorativeness of their evaluation: Gidur-Log, BandarLog:

«For a wolf, no,» said Tabaqui, «but for so mean a person as myself a dry bone is a good feast. Who are we, the Gidur-log [the jackal people], to pick and choose?”

A negative character is also the main criminal of the jungle – Shere Khan the tiger, who is such a mean creature to kill people and domestic animals that are not able to fight the tiger.

«The Wolves are a free people,» said Father Wolf. «They take orders from the Head of the Pack, and not from any striped cattle-killer.”

In this Father Wolf’s statement all the contempt of the free tribe to the tiger is expressed with the help of epithet configuration striped cattle-killer.

The same despise-pejorative evaluation is expressed also in the words of the main character Mowgli:

 “This cattle-killer said he would kill me in the Council because he had not killed me when I was a cub.”

Pejorative evaluation of the animal is found in the characteristics of this tiger given by a common man from the nearest village:

“Buldeo was explaining how the tiger that had carried away Messua’s son was a ghost-tiger, and his body was inhabited by the ghost of a wicked, old money-lender, who had died some years ago.”

Describing the tiger as a creature whose body is inhabited by dead money-lenders’ souls, a common man expresses not only fear of a big predator but also transfers onto Shere Khan the whole contempt of people to representatives of this profession.

But the greatest despise is given by free jungle-people to Tabaqui the jackal, who is characterized with the metaphors Dishlicker and mischiefmaker:

“It was the jackal—Tabaqui, the Dish-licker—and the wolves of India despise Tabaqui because he runs about making mischief, and telling tales, and eating rags and pieces of leather from the village rubbish-heaps.

Tabaqui is a mischief-maker

The apostates of the wolf pack, who don’t want to hunt according to unwritten jungle law and support Shere Khan, are also set equal to the jackal:

“Akela the Lone Wolf lay by the side of his rock as a sign that the leadership of the Pack was open, and Shere Khan with his following of scrap-fed wolves walked to and fro openly being flattered.”

Kipling’s compound lexemes are not very various in structure ― the majority of them are nouns of (n+n) model which combine the name and the most important feature of the referent (HuntingPeople, mancub, Dishlicker etc.). But there are some compound adjectives used in the stylistic functions of comparative and descriptive-evaluative epithets which play an important part in creation of imagery in the narrative context.

“Baloo made one effort to hurry, but had to sit down panting, and so they left him to come on later, while Bagheera hurried forward, at the quick panther-canter.”

In the given example the substantive lexeme panther-canter characterizes a hurry, in which Mowgli’s friends rush for helping him.

The adjective compound milk-white adds imagery to the description of the neglected town in the following example:

“But the walls were made of screens of marble tracery —beautiful milk-white fretwork, set with agates and cornelians and jasper and lapis lazuli, and as the moon came up behind the hill it shone through the open work, casting shadows on the ground like black velvet embroidery.”

Another example expresses fascination of everyone around with python’s movements; here the axiologically neutral lexeme fivesided gets certain meliorative connotations in the context of description of Kaa’s hunting dance and stresses a horrible charm of his movements:

“Then he began making loops and figures of eight with his body, and soft, oozy triangles that melted into squares and five-sided figures, and coiled mounds, never resting, never hurrying, and never stopping his low humming song.”

Problems of human society are quite transparent in the relationships of jungle community: quarrelling for a prey, mutual respect (or disrespect), moral basis etc. But in spite of all similarities of problems, jungle community and human society are very different; the Mowgli’s tragedy rises out of this difference. On the one hand, a child brought up by animals has got a perfect physical development and is able to survive in certain difficult situations, but on the other hand, such a man cannot live in a human society having its own laws which completely differ from the laws of the animal world.

«Man-Pack and Wolf-Pack have cast me out,» said Mowgli. «Now I will hunt alone in the jungle.»

The problem of co-existence of a human and nature, lined up by D. R. Kipling, arises in its ugliness nowadays, when everyday comfort is weighed against the very existence in general. Now Kipling’s works are considered in quite a different way: perhaps, the Nature shouldn’t be won and changed, but maybe we must learn its laws and peacefully co-exist with it.

Research findings and prospects for future research. Kipling’s compound lexemes are very specific because his characters are animals, living in certain community with its own laws. Peculiarities of these lexemes leave little perspective for their usualization because they were made for definite purposes. One cannot indeed imagine common usage of the words like bushtailed idiot”. However, we can mention an example of a usualized Kipling’s lexeme – dish-licker – which has entered the language system as a pejorative-evaluative name of a sycophant.

Further researches in the sphere of usage of compound lexemes for verbalization of the problem of relationships between a human and his surrounding are considered to be perspective ones.

 

 

Литература

 

  1. Дембовська Л. М. Пряма і непряма композитна номінація в англійській мові : соціодискурсивний аспект : дис… канд. філол. наук : 10.02.04 / Дембовська Людмила Михайлівна. ― Київ, 2011. ― 233 с.
  2. Левицький А. Е. Основи функціональної лінгвістики / Левицький Андрій Едуардович. ― Ніжин : Редакційно-видавничий відділ НДПУ. ― 2004. ― 124 с.
  3. Лосева В. В. Корреляция категорий автор – читатель в художественном тексте / Лосева В. В. // Проблеми лінгвістики тексту та лінгвометодики. ― Львів : Львівський держ. ун-т ім. Івана Франка. ― 1992. ― С. 121–
  4. Мороховский А. Н. К понятию прецикла стилистического анализа художественного текста / Мороховский А. Н. // Лингвистика текста иобучение иностранным языкам. ― К. : «Вища школа». ― 1978. ― С. 68–75.